SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
D. P. Pardhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Counsel Name]
For the Respondents: [Counsel Name]

1. This is a petition tinder Art.226 and Art.227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to have the order of the second respondent, Collector, Jabalpur, dated 6-9-1973 (Petitioner's Annexure O) quashed as also the prosecution launched against the petitioner quashed on the grounds that the seizure of Vansada (vegetable oil) tins by the Collector was illegal inasmuch as the petitioner being a producer, did not at all require a licence under the Madhya Pradesh Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Dealers' Licensing Order, 1968 .

2. The petitioner in the amended petition has prayed for the following reliefs :
(a) declare by an appropriate writ, order or direction the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Dealers' Licensing Order, 1968 , as ultra vires and illegal, by further quashing all actions taken by the respondents either by themselves or through their agents, employees, servants against the petitioner and their employees in pursuance thereof ;
(b) quash by an appropriate writ, order or direction the notice dated 6-9-1973 (Annexure O) issued to the petitioner by the second respondent, Collector, Jabalpur, and by an appropriate writ further quash the order dated 27-10-73,





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top