MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
D. P. Pardhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking quashing of illegal seizure and prosecution based on licensing order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. emphasis on harmonious construction in legal provisions. (Para 4 , 20) |
| 3. interpretation of licensing requirements for producers engaged as dealers. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. This is a petition tinder Art.226 and Art.227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to have the order of the second respondent, Collector, Jabalpur, dated 6-9-1973 (Petitioner's Annexure O) quashed as also the prosecution launched against the petitioner quashed on the grounds that the seizure of Vansada (vegetable oil) tins by the Collector was illegal inasmuch as the petitioner being a producer, did not at all require a licence under the Madhya Pradesh Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Dealers' Licensing Order, 1968 .
2. The petitioner in the amended petition has prayed for the following reliefs :
(a) declare by an appropriate writ, order or direction the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Dealers' Licensing Order, 1968 , as ultra vires and illegal, by further quashing all actions taken by the respondents either by themselves or through their agents, employees, servants against the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.