SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Abdul Hakim and Another v. Ahmad Kha


Table of Content
1. defendants' use of latrine was established as nuisance. (Para 1 , 10 , 11 , 40)
2. respondent's claims of nuisance were confirmed through evidence. (Para 2 , 6 , 8 , 12)
3. legal principles of nuisance applied justify injunction. (Para 17 , 34)
4. nuisance requires consideration of property rights and local laws. (Para 20 , 21 , 24)

1. This is defendants' appeal from a reversing decree dt. 2-9-1974 passed by the Additional District Judge, Guna, in Civil Appeal No. 86 of 1979 arising out of the decree dt. 11-7-69 of the Civil Judge Class II, Mungaoli, whereby the respondent's suit (C.S. No. 47 - A / 66 instituted on 4-7-66) for a mandatory injunction for closure of the 'nikas', 'mori' and 'Khidki' of the appellants newly constructed latrine was dismissed.

2. The following facts were admitted in the written statement.
There is a 3' X 31/2' wide lane running east - west between the respondent's house to its north and the appellants' house to the south of the said lane at Athaipura Ward No. 7 in the town of Mungaoli. With the sanction of the Municipal Committee in 1964 the appellants opened a door in their house in the northern wing which is situated adjacent to, and along



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top