Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A. M. Khanwilkar, J
Natwar Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Regional Transport Officer and Tax Officer Jabalpur (M.P.) and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petition details and permit issuance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the permit and tax liability. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal analysis of permit validity during appeal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. conclusion and decision of the court. (Para 8) |
1. This is a petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India.
2. The material facts giving rise to this petition, briefly, are as follows : The petitioner was granted by the State Transport Authority, Maharashtra, a permit under the Motor Vehicles Act , 1939 (hereinafter called the Act) for plying stage carriages on the route Nagpur-Warud via Pandhurna, for a period of three years expiring on 30-6-1984. A part of the aforesaid route falls within the State of M.P. and is, therefore, Inter-State route and is covered by an agreement entered into between the State of Maharashtra and the State of Madhya Pradesh under the provisions of S.63-A of the Act. As required by S.63(1) of the Act, the permit granted to the petitioner as aforesaid, was countersigned by the State Transport Authority, Madhya Pradesh. The application for renewal of the aforesaid permit submitted by the petitioner, was rejected by the State
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
