SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
R. G. Mishra, J
Motilal – Appellant
Versus
Anandilal – Respondent


1. This judgment shall also dispose of L.P.A. No. 13 / 80 preferred by the present respondents.

2. The two appeals have arisen out of the judgment dated 5-11-1980 of R. G. Mishra, J., in Misc. Petition No. 14/72 (Motilal v. Anandi Lal, under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

3. The learned single Judge remanded a proceeding under S. 189(1) of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short "the Code") to the Revenue Commissioner Gwalior Division, Gwalior to decide afresh in advertence to the findings and directions given by the learned single Judge the matter of petitioner Motilal's application for the resumption of 12 bighas 8 biswas out of S. No. 437, with present respondents 1 and 2 (Anandilal and Pannalal) and their brother Rampratap (since deceased and now represented by his widow respondent No. 3 Kadam Bai and their minor son respondent No. 4 Narrotum) and the remaining 12 bighas 8 biswas out of S. No. 437 S. No. 464 (10 bighas 5 biswas), with present respondent No. 5 Prahlad.

4. Incidentally, the revenue proceeding in question relating to the resumption of S. No. 442 (16 bighas 13 biswas) with a Ramchand ended finally in favour of Motilal before the Board of Revenue with the

























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top