Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
R.S. Garg, J
Dr. (Ku.) Arifa Almas – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common legal questions arise from multiple petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. eligibility for admission based on house job requirements. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. claims for vacant seats by the petitioners. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's examination of the merit and admission rules. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. review of state rules vs medical council recommendations. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. comparison of admission criteria for meritorious candidates. (Para 21 , 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 7. assessment of admissions based on merit and available seats. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. final decisions and dismissal of petitions. (Para 31 , 32) |
1. The order passed in this petition will also govern the disposal of Misc. Petition No. 4037 of 1989 (Dr. (Smt.) Namrata Seth v. State of M. P. and others); Misc. Petition No. 5256 of 1989 (Dr. (Smt.) Namrata Seth v. State of M.P. and 2 others); Misc. Petition No. 29 of 1990 (Dr. (Ku.) Alka Gupta v. State of M. P. and 2 others) and Misc. Petition No. 210 of 1990 (Dr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra and another v. State of M. P. and 4 others), as common question of law and facts arise in all these five petitions which may be disposed of by a common order.
2. In all t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
