SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Shri Kutumble, J
Shivlal and seven Others v. Girish Kumar and Others
Misc. P. No. 758 of 97



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Kutumble
For the Respondents: Shri Dandwate

The Court emphasized the entitlement to interim compensation under S.140 of the M.V. Act when prima facie evidence supports the claim.

Headnote:The Tribunal failed to consider key evidence including the FIR and insurance cover note regarding an accident involving a truck insured by respondent No. 3, leading to a denial of interim compensation under S.140 of the M.V. Act. The Court determined that the prerequisites of prima facie evidence and liability under the Act were met. Consequently, the order was set aside, affirming the appellants' right to interim compensation with directives for the respondents to deposit the amount within a given timeframe.

Table of Content
1. evidence of accident details provided. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court identified errors in the tribunal's judgment. (Para 3)

1. Shri Kutumble submitted that the learned Tribunal did not peruse the FIR which mentions the name of deceased and the number of the truck involved in the said accident. He further pointed - out that insurance cover note which is on record also mentions that the said truck was insured with respondent No. 3 on the date and time of the said accident. He submitted that in spite of this the Tribunal did not award interim compensation to the appellants in view of the provisions of S.140 of the M.V. Act .

2. Shri Dandwate, counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 submitted that the Tribunal was right in rejecting the prayer of appellants for interim compensation because the driver and the owner of the said truck have denied the liability.

3. I do not find any substance in the submission of Shri Dandwate, counsel appearing for respondent No. 3. S.140 of the M.V. Act is the provision studded in benevolent legal provisions of M.V. Act . What the Tribunal has to do is to find - out whether prima facie there was an accident in which motor vehicles were involved, whether the claimant was involved in the said accident, whether he sustained injuries which are capable of causing permanent disability or the death and lastly whether the vehicle involved in the accident was insured with the insurance company? The FIR mentions the name of deceased / victim. It also mentions the number of the vehicle involved in the accident. The cover note prima facie shows that on the date and time of the accident said truck was insured with respondent No. 3. The Tribunal has obviously committed the error in rejecting the interim compensation to the appellants when it was prayed for by them in view of the provisions of S.140 of the M.V. Act . Thus the said order which is challenged stands set aside and it is declared that appellants are entitled to receive interim compensation in view of the provisions of S.140 of the M.V. Act . Respondents 1 to 3 are directed to deposit that amount within 2 months in the office of the Tribunal, otherwise they would be liable to pay interest on the amount at the rate of 18% p.a. Record be despatched to the Tribunal for early trial. Parties to remain present before the Tribunal on 10-11-98 or the date fixed by the Tribunal.
Appeal allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top