Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Kanhiyalal (deceased) through L.Rs. v. Vishnu Giri
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the appeal and context regarding compensation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal representatives and limitations on claims (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. interest and delay considerations in process (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's evaluation of evidence and awarded amounts (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final verdict and rectification of previous award (Para 10) |
1. This is an appeal filed by the claimants under S.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against an award dated 5.9.2006, passed by Additional M.A.C.T., Jhabua in Claim Case No. 220 of 2005. By impugned award, the Claims Tribunal has awarded a total sum of Rs. 3,23,500 with interest to the claimants for the death of one Kanhiyalal, who died in a vehicular accident. According to the claimants, the compensation awarded is on the lower side and hence, it needs to be enhanced. It is for the enhancement in the compensation awarded by Claims Tribunal, the claimant has filed this appeal. So the question that arises for consideration is whether any case for enhancement in compensation awarded by the Tribunal on facts / evidence adduced is made out in the compensation awarded and, if so, to what extent?
2. It is not necessary to narrate the entire facts in deta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
