Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
R. S. Garg, Prakash Shrivastava, JJ.
Umesh Kumar Prakashchandra Sharma v. Rajaram Ramchandra Jat and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the impounding of the document. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments concerning entitlement and the necessity of stamp duty. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on document classification and compliance with statutory duties. (Para 9 , 10 , 18) |
1. Yesterday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kutumbale, who is otherwise holding the Office of Additional Advocate General, appeared in the matter and there was no representation from the side of the State Government, therefore, we recorded the proceedings and referred the copies of the same to the Advocate General for making appropriate arrangements for representation of the State in the matter where the duty and penalty is recoverable on a document and the amount is to go to the coffers of the State Government.
2. Today, Shri A. S. Kutumbale is not appearing in the matter, but Shri Amit Purohit appears for the petitioner, Shri B. I. Mehta appears for respondent No.1 while Smt. Rashmi Pandit appears under the authorization by the Advocate General for the State Government.
3. The petitioner / plaintiff Umesh Kumar being aggrieved by the order dated 28-3-2008 passed by the learned District Judge, Man
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
