Pappu alias Chandra Pravesh Tiwari v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2013 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Pappu alias Chandra Pravesh Tiwari v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Learned counsel for the applicant]
For the Respondents: [Learned Panel Lawyer]

Table of Content
1. summary of applicant’s revision and case background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by the applicant and opposition. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning on applications under cr.p.c. (Para 6 , 8)
4. legal precedent regarding the witness's status. (Para 7)
5. final ruling on the revision application. (Para 9 , 10)

1. The applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 23.11.2011 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in S.T. No.152/04, whereby the application filed by the applicant under S.233(3) of Cr.P.C. was dismissed.

2. The facts of the case, in short are that, the applicant is an accused in a murder trial pending before the trial Court. In that trial, the witnesses namely Arun Tiwari (PW - 9) and V.P. Singh were examined and cross - examinationed. Thereafter, an application under S.311 of Cr.P.C. was moved to recall these witnesses but the same was dismissed by the trial Court. Thereafter, an application under S.233(3) of Cr.P.C. was moved, which was dismissed by the trial Court by passing the impugned order.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document