MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A.K. Sethi, J
Jaheed Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on obtained evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments challenging the validity of the conviction. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. significance of producing evidence in drug-related trials. (Para 11 , 15 , 20) |
| 4. non-production of seized items led to failure of prosecution. (Para 12 , 21) |
| 5. final acquittal of the accused due to evidence issues. (Para 22) |
1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11th October, 2004 passed by the Special Judge, Vidisha in Special Criminal Case No.51/2004 (State of M.P. v. Jaheed Khan) convicting the appellant / accused under S.20 (b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and sentenced him to suffer ten years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default additional rigorous imprisonment for one year, the appellant has preferred this appeal, under S.374 of the Code of
2. The background facts of the case, in brief, are that Town Inspector, A.K. Dubey, Officer - in - Charge, Police Station, Kotwali, Vidisha (P.W.4) received on telephone a secret information on 16.04.2004 at 21.45 pm that the accused, Jahed Khan resident of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.