SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judge Name, J
State – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar and Bhart Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Counsel for the appellant
For the Respondents:Counsel for the respondents

1. By this application under S.378(3) of the Cr.P.C. the applicant / State has prayed for grant to leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 23.05.2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhar in Criminal Appeal No. 62/2012 acquitting the accused from offence under S.498(A) of the IPC.

2. Briefly stated of the prosecution case is that on 04.07.2010 at 3:00 pm Police Thana Sagur received a complaint from the complainant Uma, who along with her father registered an FIR that she was married to one Sonu @ Rajkumar one year prior of the incident and initially she was treated properly by her husband and father - in - law Bharatsingh. However thereafter, along with father - in - law her brother - in - law Govind started taunting her and asked for dowry. They used to partake alcohol and also physically assaulted her numbers of times, they asked for 25 tolas of gold and one day drove her away from the matrimonial home. Her father - in - law Bharat Singh had escorted her to her parents' house one and half months prior to filing the FIR since then she was living with her parents. On the date of incident she had gone to her matrimonial home along with her father Bhagvan Singh when th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top