Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judge Name, J
State – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumar and Bhart Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of dowry demands and cruelty must be substantiated by clear evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the sufficiency of evidence and credibility of testimonies. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. the court's observations on the necessity of rigorous evidence in acquittal cases. (Para 6) |
1. By this application under S.378(3) of the Cr.P.C. the applicant / State has prayed for grant to leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 23.05.2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhar in Criminal Appeal No. 62/2012 acquitting the accused from offence under S.498(A) of the IPC.
2. Briefly stated of the prosecution case is that on 04.07.2010 at 3:00 pm Police Thana Sagur received a complaint from the complainant Uma, who along with her father registered an FIR that she was married to one Sonu @ Rajkumar one year prior of the incident and initially she was treated properly by her husband and father - in - law Bharatsingh. However thereafter, along with father - in - law her brother - in - law Govind started taunting her and asked for dowry. They used to partake alcohol and also physically assaulted her numbers of times, they asked for 25 tola
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
