MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A.M. Khanwilkar, J
Hotel Adityaz Limited v. Madhya Pradesh Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. Bhopal and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges supplementary bill and claims of tampering. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal argument emphasizes jurisdiction in disputed factual matters. (Para 5 , 10 , 15) |
| 3. court finds actions valid under s.135 of the electricity act. (Para 18 , 26) |
1.This petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution challenges the supplementary electricity bill dated 1.7.2014 (Annexure P / 1), the Panchnama (Annexure P / 2) and the interim assessment of tariff (Annexure P / 3).
2. The facts as canvassed by Shri D. K. Katare, learned counsel for the petitioner are that petitioner Hotel Adityas Ltd., is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner obtained high tension connection of 300 KV through service connection. The petitioner is paying monthly electricity bill regularly. It is stated that while giving high tension connection of 300 KV to the hotel, the service meter is installed on the electric poll, which is near to the outer gate of hotel premises. It is situated in an open space and is near about 70 ft. away from the hotel premises. The height of electric poll is 20 ft. and it is on the public place, not approachable by particular individual. For in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.