MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A. M. Khanwilkar, J
Suresh Bhilala – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail application filed under s.438 of the crpc. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding reliability of evidence and social implications. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's assessment and decision on grant of bail. (Para 4) |
| 4. conditions and final directives upon granting bail. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
1. By this application filed under S.438 of the CrPC the applicant Suresh Bhilala has moved the application for grant of anticipatory bail being implicated in Crime No. 296/15 registered by police station Kukshi, Distt. Dhar for offence under S.376 & S.506 of IPC.
2. Counsel for the applicant has vehemently argued that it was a case of false implication. Even if the prosecution allegations are considered, Counsel submitted that the prosecutrix was not very reliable and was the sister - in - law of the present applicant. She has denied the entire incident in the statements recorded before the Court under S.164 of the CrPC and the applicant has full chance of success in the trial. He is likely to face social embarrassment and ostracisation, if arrested, besides the prosecutrix is a major person of 19 year, and Counsel prayed that the application be allowed.
3. Counsel for the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.