Indoriya Security Force v. State of M. P. and Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(Online)(MP) 540

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Mr. , J
Indoriya Security Force v. State of M. P. and Others

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Dharmadhikari, Government Advocate
For the Respondents:Counsel for respondent No. 4

Table of Content
1. tender process and eligibility evaluation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding bid rejection legality. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. judicial review principles in administrative decisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. outcome of petitions and costs. (Para 17 , 18)

1. Since the pleadings are complete, therefore, they are finally heard. Record perused.

2. This order shall also govern the disposal of W.P. No.19992/2015 and W.P. No.20799/2015 as the common questions of law and facts are involved in all the three writ petitions.

3. Uncontroverted and relevant facts lie in a narrow compass. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, District - Sehore (respondent No.2) for the financial year 2015-16 invited separate tender for outsourcing the work of House Keeping and Security Services, for Hospital & Dispensaries situated within the District Sehore under the jurisdiction of respondent No.2. As per tender document, the bidder was required to submit Technical and Financial bid in two separate envelopes. First the Technical bid was to open and assessed and those qualified in that round, their Financial Bids were to open later, before awarding the contract for which tenders wer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 Supreme(Online)(MP) 540

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTMr. , JIndoriya Security Force v. State of M. P. and Others

Cases Referred (2)

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Mr. , J
Indoriya Security Force v. State of M. P. and Others