SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(MP) 546

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Maa Sheetla Sayapeeth Mandir Vyavasthapan Samiti/Shitla Mata Kalyan Samiti v. State of M. P. and Others
Writ Petition No.1331/2009



A society must substantiate ownership to claim exemption under the Trust Act; the absence of title negates jurisdiction to register the public trust.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The Court analyzed the Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 and the Public Trust Act, focusing on S.36(1)(b) of the Trust Act—facts reveal a society registered as Shitla Mata Kalyan Samiti challenging a public trust registration. Findings: The Court determined the challenge based on jurisdictional issues and evident lack of ownership.

Issues: The Court framed the query around the applicability of the Trust Act to the society.

Ratio Decidendi: It emphasized administrative control under the applicable Act, highlighting the necessity for proof of ownership.

Result: The impugned order for registration of the public trust is set aside; the Registrar, Public Trust, is directed to restart proceedings from the notice stage.

Table of Content
1. registration under the adhiniyam is contested based on jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the society's claim over the temple lacks substantive evidence. (Para 3)
3. jurisdiction is assessed in light of prior court orders. (Para 4)

1. A society vide Annexure P / 2 shown to have been registered under the provisions of Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 (for brevity "the Adhiniyam of 1973") on 16/3/2009 in the name of Shitla Mata Kalyan Samiti; the petitioner, has approached this Court with the grievance initially against the notice dated 10/5/2010, Annexure P / 1, under S.5 (2) of the Public Trust Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Trust Act") read with R.5 (1) of the Public Trust Rules, 1962 under the signatures of Registrar, Public Trust, Gwalior inviting objections on an application filed by the Ex - officio Tehsildar under S.4 of the Trust Act for registration of public trust in the name of Mandir Maa Shitla Mata Nyas, Village Satau, District Gwalior. The notice was published in the Gazette as well on 28/5/2010 calling upon the interested persons to file objections on 11/6/2010 in the matter of enquiry as regards registration of the trust as contemplated under S.5 of the Trust Act. During pendency of the petition, the findings recorded by the Registrar, Public Trust, under S.6 of the Trust Act and further order for registration of Public Trust on 3/7/2010 has been challenged.

2. Petitioner has contended that Shitla Mata temple is one of the oldest temple of the area and was originally constructed 400 years ago by the forefather of the petitioner - Late Shri Gajadhar Singh, which was initially installed at village Kharaua, Tehsil Gohad, District Bhind, but later on as Goddess Shitla Mata in his dreams expressed her wishes to shift her and install in the forest area away from his residence, therefore, by obeying the orders of Goddess Shitla Mata the forefathers of the petitioner installed the Deity Shitla Mata in Kho known as Shitla Mata Mandir, Kho. After the death of Gajadhar Singh, his son Ramanand Singh and then his son Mahant Har Govind Singh and thereafter present Mahant Nathuram is in charge of the Deity's worship and management. As such, it is a private temple and property of Mahant Nathuram since Samvat 1669 (year 1612). Now in the interest of temple and the Deity it was decided in the year 2009 to get the society registered under the Adhiniyam of 1973 in the name of Shitla Mata Kalyan Samiti, Satau, Tehsil Gwalior, District Gwalior. Accordingly, the society is registered vide registration certificate dated 16/3/2009.
With the aforesaid pleadings, it is submitted that the society being administered under the Adhiniyam of 1973, the provisions of the Trust Act are not applicable to it in the light of provisions contained under S.36 (1) (b) of the Trust Act and, therefore, the impugned notice issued under S.5 of the Trust Act and published in the Gazette calling upon the objections for registration of trust in the name of Mandir Maa Shitla Mata Nyas is patently illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Trust Act.
The order dated 3/7/2010 passed by the Registrar, Public Trust, recording the findings under S.6 of the Trust Act and further direction for registration of the public trust is without jurisdiction and illegal. The said order is also patently illegal and contemptuous, as despite interim order passed by this Court on 24/6/2010 staying further proceedings of registration of the society as public trust pursuant to notice dated 10/5/2010, the same has been passed.


3. The respondents have filed counter affidavit. It is contended that temple of Maa Shitla is located on survey nos.397, 398, 399 and 400. The same is recorded as forest land in the revenue records. The temple is situated on survey no.398. As such, it is the public property. Petitioner without disclosing the fact that the temple is on the Government land and not on the private land manipulated issuance of the registration certificate, A




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top