Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
, J
Rathi C. K. v. Sudarshan Jhawar and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision filed against sessions court's order on charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. allegation of unauthorised lease execution impacting ownership. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's observation on the effect of false declaration. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 4. revision allowed with case remanded for rehearing. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. This criminal revision under S.397 read with S.401 of Cr.P.C has been filed against the order dated 14.5.2012 passed by Tenth ASJ Gwalior in Sessions Trial No.180 of 2012 by which, the respondents were discharged from offences under S.420, S.467 and S.468 of IPC and only charge under S.423 of IPC was framed and since the offence under S.423 of IPC is not triable by the Sessions Court, therefore, the case was sent back to the Committal Court for trial.
2. It is not out of place to mention here that the respondents had also filed a petition under S.482 of Cr.P.C against the order dated 14.5.2012 before this court which was registered as M.Cr.C.No.9392 of 2012. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that the said case has already been dismissed in default by this court vide order dated 9.12.2016.
3. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present revision in shor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
