SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Judge, J
Dhanraj Singh and Another v. State of M. P.


Table of Content
1. overview of the case facts and initial conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. procedural details and arguments by the appellants. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. analysis of medical evidence and prosecutrix's statement. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. rationale determining lack of reliable evidence against accused. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
5. final ruling reversing the conviction. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment and order of conviction dated 19/09/2003 passed by the Special Judge, Vidisha in Special Case No. 71 of 2003 by which the appellants have been convicted for the offence under S.376(2) (g) IPC and sentenced them in the following manner : -

2. The facts leading to filing of this appeal are as under : On 30/01/2003 at about 10.30 pm, Puran (P.W.5) who is the Samdhi of Antram (P.W.4) father of the prosecturix (P.W.3), lodged a complaint at Police Station, Ganjbasoda, District Vidisha stating inter alia that the porseutrix has left her home in village Sakroli without informing anybody at about 4.00 pm on 30/01/2003. When they enquired regarding whereabouts, it was informed that she was seen with Pappu, appellan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top