SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1465

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Not mentioned, J
Sundarlal v. State of M. P. and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Chaturvedi
For the Respondents: Mr. Yadav

Table of Content
1. petition requests pregnancy termination for a minor rape victim. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented concerning consent and legal provisions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court examines statutory requirements and urgency in cases of mental health. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. court ruling on the necessity of medical assessment and guardian consent. (Para 18)
5. outcome mandates a committee's assessment within stipulated time. (Para 19)

1. In this petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents for terminating the pregnancy of his minor daughter who is allegedly a rape victim. In addition, petitioner has prayed for grant of suitable compensation.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he lodged a report before Police Station Mundi, District Khandwa on 15.10.2017 stating that his minor daughter has been kidnapped. The respondent No.6, in turn, investigated the matter and arrested the accused. The offences under S.363, S.366, S.376 of IPC read with S.4 & S.6 of POCOS Act were alleged against the accused. The police authority secured custody of the minor daughter (herein after

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top