IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
J, Judge
Kiran Pasi v. Subhashchandra Pasi
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties are involved in a marital dispute regarding cruelty and restitution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court evaluated evidence and arguments regarding mental cruelty and responsibilities. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. established that mental cruelty may result from prolonged separation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. the court decided to grant divorce based on the circumstances. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
1. These appeals have been preferred by the appellant - wife under S.19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 for setting aside the common judgment dated 05.08.2014 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 150 - A / 2012 and 151 - A / 2012 whereby restitution of conjugal rights has been granted in favour of the respondent - husband and appellant's application for divorce has been refused. As both these cases arise out of a common order, therefore, we propose to deal with the matters analogously and dispose of both the appeals by this common judgment.
2. It is not disputed that the appellant is the wife of respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 20.04.2008 as per Hindu rites and customs. Brief facts of the case is that, sometime after the marriage, the respondent -
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.