SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1470

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
J, Judge
Kiran Pasi v. Subhashchandra Pasi


1. These appeals have been preferred by the appellant - wife under S.19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 for setting aside the common judgment dated 05.08.2014 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 150 - A / 2012 and 151 - A / 2012 whereby restitution of conjugal rights has been granted in favour of the respondent - husband and appellant's application for divorce has been refused. As both these cases arise out of a common order, therefore, we propose to deal with the matters analogously and dispose of both the appeals by this common judgment.

2. It is not disputed that the appellant is the wife of respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 20.04.2008 as per Hindu rites and customs. Brief facts of the case is that, sometime after the marriage, the respondent - husband deserted the appellant - wife. The respondent and his family members demanded Rs.3 lakhs from the appellant - wife to purchase a house. When the demand was not fulfilled, they harassed her. The respondent did not support the appellant and was not interested to take her to Delhi, where the respondent was working. The family members of the respondent compelled her to give away her sal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top