Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Goutehri, J
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident involving the disappearance and subsequent discovery of the deceased. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defense raised issues regarding credibility and circumstantial evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. standards established for circumstantial evidence and its application. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. evidence and linkages established supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. conclusion affirming the trial court's decision based on thorough evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 27) |
1. This appeal under S.374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, has been filed by the appellant / accused being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28/09/2007 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Satna, in Session Trial No.67/2005, in which the trial Court held the appellant guilty for commission of offence punishable under S.376 (1), 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and awarded the sentences as follows -
All the sentences to be run concurrently.
2. The prosecution story in brief is that deceased victim aged 8 years was the daughter of Smt. Kuraisa Bi (P.W - 6). Deceased was playing in front of the house of Smt. Kuraisa on 21.1.2005 in the evening. It was the day of Bakrid. After so
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
