Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J
Shri Anil Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Shri Y.D. Yadav – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts leading to the seizure of the vehicle. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding interim custody. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on the applicability of law. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final ruling on interim custody order. (Para 8) |
This petition has been filed under S.482 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 10.8.2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Khandwa in Criminal Revision No.65/2018 whereby; learned Sessions Judge affirmed the order dated 03.07.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Distt. Khandwa whereby; learned JMFC rejected applicant's application filed under S.457 of Cr.P.C. for getting interim custody of vehicle bearing registration No.MP - 09 - HF - 8765 seized by the police in Crime No.107/2018 registered at police Station Pandhana for the offence punishable under S.4,6,9 Madhya Pradesh Govansh Pratishedh Adhiniyam 2004 (for short 'The Adhiniyam') and S.11 - D of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act .
2. Brief facts of the case which are relevant to the disposal of this petition are that on 04.03.2018 on the information of informant police intercepted the vehicle bearing registration No.MP - 09 - HF - 8765. On checking t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
