SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1811

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
, J
Mohan Vyas v. Surendra Vyas


Table of Content
1. overview of the appeal against temporary injunction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. defendant argues for reconstruction due to adverse possession. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding rights of co-ownership. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's discretion in granting injunction assessed. (Para 8 , 9)
5. importance of co-owner consent in construction. (Para 10 , 11)
6. final ruling on the injunction's merit. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

1. This miscellaneous appeal under O.43 R.1(r) of the CPC is at the instance of the defendant challenging the order of temporary injunction dated 29.4.2017 passed by the trial Court in C.S. No.30A / 2017.

2. The respondent (plaintiff) has filed the suit and an application for temporary injunction with the plea that suit property was purchased by his grand - father Chunnilal and his sons Jamnalal, Kanhaiyalal and Biharilal. Chunnilal had died 60 years back. Kanhaiyalal and Biharilal were unmarried and had died without leaving any heir. Hence Jamnalal became sole owner, who had also died in 1995 leaving behind the appellant, respondent and their three sisters. It was further pleaded that after reconstructing part of the suit house appellant is residing therein and he has kept t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top