IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
, J
Mohan Vyas v. Surendra Vyas
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal against temporary injunction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant argues for reconstruction due to adverse possession. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding rights of co-ownership. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's discretion in granting injunction assessed. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. importance of co-owner consent in construction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. final ruling on the injunction's merit. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
1. This miscellaneous appeal under O.43 R.1(r) of the CPC is at the instance of the defendant challenging the order of temporary injunction dated 29.4.2017 passed by the trial Court in C.S. No.30A / 2017.
2. The respondent (plaintiff) has filed the suit and an application for temporary injunction with the plea that suit property was purchased by his grand - father Chunnilal and his sons Jamnalal, Kanhaiyalal and Biharilal. Chunnilal had died 60 years back. Kanhaiyalal and Biharilal were unmarried and had died without leaving any heir. Hence Jamnalal became sole owner, who had also died in 1995 leaving behind the appellant, respondent and their three sisters. It was further pleaded that after reconstructing part of the suit house appellant is residing therein and he has kept t
Skyline Education Institute (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. S.L. Vaswani and Anr.
Wander Ltd. Vs. Antox India (P) Ltd.
Cadila Health Care Ltd. Vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals
I. Gouri and others Vs. C.H. Ibrahim and another
Jacobs Private Limited Vs. Thomas Jacob
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.