Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
R.K. Soni, J
Satyanarayan Mishra and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. implications of family in marital disputes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims against relatives lack substantiation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. assessing evidence for prima facie case. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial cautions against wrongful implications. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's decision on charges against family members. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. Applicants / accused have filed this Miscellaneous Criminal Case under S.482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the impugned FIR registered vide Crime No. 20/2018, at police station Shabapur, District Satna and also to quash further proceedings of that case.
2. The prosecution story in short is that respondent No.2 / complainant Smt. Nisha Gautam and Vishesh Gautam performed their marriage on 17.01.2017. The applicant / accused Nos.1 and 2 are uncle - in - law and aunt - inlaw, applicant / accused No.3, Ram Prakash Gautam is father - in - law, applicant / accused No.4 Sujata Gautam is mother - in - law, applicant / accused No.5 Mayank Gautam and applicant / accused No.6, Brij Mohan Gautam are brothers - in - law of respondent No.2 / complainant, respectively. After the marriage complainant / respondent No.2 went to her in laws house for performing her matrimoni
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
