Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Radheshyam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and sentencing details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 11) |
| 3. testimony evaluations and contradictions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. court's reasoning for acquittal. (Para 18) |
| 5. outcome and result of the appeal. (Para 19 , 20) |
1. The present criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellants under S.374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 27.11.1998, delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur, in Sessions Trial No.59/1995, whereby appellant no.1 Radheshyam has been found guilty for commission of offence punishable under S.326 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the IPC ') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.100/-, with default stipulation and all appellants Radheshyam, Ramji, Hotram and Khet Singh have also been found guilty for commission of offence punishable under S.325 or 325/34 of and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each and to pay fine of Rs.100/- each, with default stipulations.
2. The case of the prosecution in b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
