SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1837

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
M/s. S.E.W. Construction Ltd. – Respondent


1. State of Madhya Pradesh through its instrumentalities has filed this Arbitration Revision being aggrieved by award dated 26.11.2008 passed in Reference Case No.6/08 by M.P. Arbitration Tribunal, Vindhyachal Bhawan, Bhopal, in the case of M/s. S.E.W. Construction Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. (Water Resources Department), whereby on the ground of expenditure incurred by the respondent in bringing sand from Mahuar river as per the terms and conditions of sanction granted by the Superintending Engineer in terms of the provisions contained in clause 3.11(A), Reference Case has been allowed and Arbitration Tribunal has directed to pay such difference amount on account of cost incurred by the contractor in bringing sand for the purpose of construction from a distant lead alongwith interest at the rate of 9% from the date of filing of the reference petition.

2. Learned counsel for the State submits that State had issued tender notice No.1/1992-93 for the construction of Masonry Dam from RD 80M to 543M of Madikhed Dam. The tender of the respondent / contractor was accepted on 6.11.1993 for an amount of Rs.1,22,81,86,600/-. Thereafter a contract was entered into between the parties and as per pa






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top