Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Vandana Kasrekar, J.
Shabnam v. Mohammad Khaleel
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed for maintenance under cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties argue on maintenance ruling. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court identifies issues related to maintenance effective date. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court mandates justification for maintenance order dates. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling restores initial maintenance order. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
1. The petitioner has filed the present criminal revision under S.397 read with S.401 of the Cr.P.C., challenging the order dated 10.10.2017 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nagda, District - Ujjain in Revision Case No. 57/2017, thereby partly allowed the revision preferred by the non - applicant / respondent and has modified the order dated 17.1.2017 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class Nagda, District - Ujjain in M.J.C.No.61/2014.
2. The petitioner / wife has preferred an application under S.125 of the Cr.P.C. against the respondent / husband before the JMFC, Nagda, Ujjain for grant of maintenance for herself and her minor children. Along with the said application, the petitioner has also filed an application for grant of ad - interim maintenance for herself and her minor children. After service
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
