SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8569

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Unknown, Unknown
Sapna Singhal v. Piyush Singhal


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Unknown
For the Respondents: Unknown

1. This petition under Art.226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 22/10/2019 (Annexure P1) passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, District Morena in Case No.173 of 2019 (HMA), by which the prayer made by the petitioner for waiver of the cooling period of six months has been rejected.

2. It is submitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that the Supreme Court in the case of Amardeep Singh v Harveen Kaur , reported in (2017) 8 SCC 746 : (AIR 2017 SC 4417) : (AIR 2018 SC (Civ) 41) : (2018 (1) ADR 655) has held that the cooling period of six months is directory and not mandatory and under the facts and circumstances of the case, the same can be waived.

3. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

4. It appears that the petitioner as well as the respondent have filed an application under S.13 - B of Hindu Marriage Act for grant of divorce by mutual consent. It appears that the application was filed for waiver of cooling period on the ground that the father of the petitioner is suffering from heart disease and he has already undergone the operation twice and it is not possible for the petitioner to stay with the respondent as husband and wife. T














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top