Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
,
Radheshyam Banjara – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail under section 439 involves assessing credibility of accusations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition to bail based on gravity of alleged offences. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's consideration of evidence, injuries, and fir delay leads to bail approval. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. conditions for bail focused on compliance and cooperation within the judicial process. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final ruling on the bail application and procedural directives. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. This is first application under S.439 of CrPC for grant of bail.
2. The applicant has been arrested on 30/1/2021 in connection with Crime No.40/2021 registered at Police Station Shamshabad, District Vidisha for offence under S.377 and S.506 of the IPC.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant Radheshyam Banjara that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He has not committed any offence. Applicant is the husband of the prosecutrix. There is matrimonial litigation pending between the applicant and the prosecutrix due to which false case has been registered against him. FIR is delayed by three days and as per FIR itself, it is reflected that the prosecutrix is residing in her matrimonial house since last one
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
