SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 14159

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Chandrakant v. Jagdish and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Unknown
For the Respondents: Unknown

1. Heard on admission.

2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Art.227 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by impugned order dated 25.02.2022 passed by First Additional District Judge, Khargone, in RCA No.48/2019, whereby the application under S.45 of Evidence Act, 1872 read with S.151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC') for getting an opinion of handwriting expert has been dismissed.

3. The brief facts of the case in nutshell are that the respondent No.1 / plaintiff herein has filed a civil suit for declaration of title, possession, damages and mesne profits in respect of a land admeasuring 03 acres which as per the alleged family arrangement dated 15.05.1996, Smt. Rampyaribai had declared to give to anyone who served her during her lifetime and the suit was decreed in favour of respondent No.1 / plaintiff vide judgment and decree dated 21.10.2019. Thereafter the petitioner has filed an appeal under S.96 of CPC before the first appellate Court on numerous grounds. During the pendency of appeal, the petitioner / appellant has filed an application under S.45 of the Evidence Act, read with S.151 of CPC for obtaining an opinion of handwritin








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top