SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 27258

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Sanjay Yadav, J
Ashish Sondhiya v. State


Table of Content
1. incident arose from disagreement over cleaning a drain. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments focus on lack of premeditation and intent. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court discusses applicability of ipc section 304. (Para 12 , 15)
4. final decision to reduce sentence based on time served. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

1. Appellants have preferred the present appeal being aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 29.11.2019 passed by the Learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in ST No.205/2017 whereby appellants have been convicted for commission of offence under Section 302 /34 of the IPC and have been sentenced to imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.5,000/- and appellant No.1 Ashish Sondhiya has also been convicted under Section 323 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 months along with fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation.

2. As per the prosecution story, in the intervening night of 09.05.2017, rainy water was collected on the roof of house of complainant-Kiran (wife of deceased Santosh). On 10.05.2017 in the morning, she saw that her husband was trying to remove water from the roof and upon inserting a stick into drain pipe, it was not clear


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top