Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Rohit Arya, Milind Ramesh Phadke, JJ.
Ramlakhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment governs connected appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the incident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defense arguments raising doubts. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. prosecution witnesses' reliability. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. analysis of trial court's judgment. (Para 14) |
| 6. evaluation of witness credibility. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. testimony of injured witnesses. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. importance of motive in eyewitness cases. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. considerations for s.307 ipc. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. judicial interpretation of s.307 ipc. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 11. discussion on absence of weapon recovery. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 12. validity of corroborative testimony. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 13. direct evidence supporting conviction. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 14. examination of appellant gudda's defense. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 15. interpretation of s.34 ipc. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 16. common intention and individual acts. (Para 41) |
| 17. affirmation of conviction for ramniwas and ramlakhan. (Para 42) |
| 18. final orders and conclusion. (Para 43 , 44) |
1. The judgment passed in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of connected Criminal Appeal No.130/2001 (Gudda alias Satyanarayan v. State of Madhya Pradesh) since the conn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
