Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Vikalp Deriya v. State of Madhya Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal charges framed under ipc must show sufficient evidence to proceed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments opposing charges underscore evidence sufficiency to establish a prima facie case. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. court reviews judicial standards for evaluating evidence in framing charges. (Para 5 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. legal precedent dictates the scrutiny applicable for charges under ipc. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 5. the conclusion reinforces the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 17) |
1. In this revision under S.397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , the applicants have challenged the validity of the order dated 11.01.2021 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad in ST No. 32 of 2020 whereby charges for commission of offence punishable under S.306, S.506 (I) / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and S.4 of the MP Riniyon Ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam , 1937 have been framed.
2. As per the prosecution case, Rajendra Sarathe (since deceased) committed suicide by hanging himself on 01.06.2019. An FIR has been lodged on 01.06.2019 at police station - Kotwali, Hoshangabad and on the basis of statements of sons of the deceased namely, Rahul Sarathe and Nitin Sarathe wherein they state
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
