SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 27304

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Santosh Sanvle v. Union of India
Misc. A. No. 3168 of 2020



Timely filing of appeals is crucial; insufficient justification for delays may result in dismissal.

Headnote:The application for condonation of delay under S.5 of the Limitation Act, filed after the impugned judgment of 13.08.2019, lacks specific supporting evidence and is rejected. The court finds the stated reasons insufficient to justify the delay. The appeal is dismissed as barred by time.

Table of Content
1. assessment of delay application. (Para 1)
2. reasons for delay deemed insufficient. (Para 2)
3. final determination on appeal dismissal. (Para 3)

1. Heard on I.A No. 8071 of 2020, an application for condonation of delay.
The impugned award was passed on 13.08.2019, whereas the appeal has been filed on 23.12.2020. This appeal is filed with a delay of 1 year 4 months.
The application filed under S.5 of the Limitation Act reads as under: -
"1. That the instant miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the appellants against the respondent before this Hon'ble Court challenging impugned order passed by the learned Claims Tribunal Bhopal challenging the same in the above appeal.
2. That the appellants are residing in Village Badholi Buzurg Tahsil Multai District Betul M.P, and in their village some network problems is also facing time to time due to that they are not contacted to any other persons.
3. That the said case was filed by appellants through the local counsel Bhopal, who conducting the case before the Railway Claims Tribunal Bhopal.
4. That in their near relation someone elder person was died, due to that they gone to attend funeral and terahavi ceremony thereafter they stay there some time because their health was not good and after recovery of their health they came to their village home, therefore, they are not aware about their case.
5. That thereafter they came to learnt from their village person that Corona Virus over the world as well as India and also advice to her to stay at Home, therefore, she was not aware about the judgment passed in her case.
6. That thereafter due to said pandemic disease Covid - 19 spread in India and lock down was declared by the Government of India on 23.03.2020. Due to the said lock down, the transportation was unavailable and stopped. Therefore, in the said period, the appellant was staying at home in village and followed the guidelines issued by Government of India. That later on, the lockdown was removed and as per the guidelines and circulars declared by the government, the situation become normal, then the appellant arrange some fund and thereafter she came to Bhopal to contact his local counsel, first time he inform that her claim has been dismissed by the Claims Tribunal Bhopal and there is a remedy of file misc. appeal before Hon'ble High Court Jabalpur and limitation period is over therefore, they should file application for condonation of delay for filing the above misc. appeal. As per the advice of the local counsel, Bhopal filing the above misc. appeal along with an application for condonation of delay as stated above in the said application.
7. That there is a delay of 385 days is bona fide and not intentional, they are illiterate persons and not knowledge about legal proceedings of law, hence the Hon'ble Court condone the delay in filing the misc. appeal in the interest of justice."

2. From the plain reading of this application, it is clear that the identity of the person who had expired has not been disclosed, even date of 13th day ceremony also not disclosed. Aliment of the appellant has not been disclosed and date of recovery from the aliment is also not disclosed. Thereafter general defence has been taken of Covid pendamic. The impugned judgment was passed on 13.08.2019 and appellant was represented by his counsel.

3. This is not a case where appellant was not aware of final disposal of the case and passing of impugned judgement by the Claims Tribunal. The application is completely silent about the reasons for not filing of appeal from 13.08.2019 till 24.03.2020 ie. the date on which complete lock down was imposed, this Court after even adopting lenient view is of the view that the application cannot be allowed. Accordingly, I.A No. 8071 of 2020 is rejected. As a consequence thereof, the appeal is dismissed as barred by time.
Appeal Dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top