SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 27305

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Raj Alias Raju Bansal v. State of Madhya Pradesh


Table of Content
1. incident leading to complaint and death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding charges and culpability. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court analysis of s.304 and s.304-a. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's decision on charges framed. (Para 8 , 9)

1. By way of this criminal revision under S.397 read with S.401 of CrPC, applicants seeking for setting aside the impugned order of framing charges dated 16-12-2021 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Sabalgarh, District Morena passed in Sessions Trial No. 396 of 2021 whereby, charges have been framed against the applicants for commission of offence under S.323/34, 304 Part - I / 34, 506 Part - II of IPC.

2. Necessary facts for disposal of present revision in short are that on 30 - 09-2021 complainant Jagdish Prasad Gupta, the father of deceased Sakshi Gupta lodged a written complaint with police station Sabalgarh alleging therein that he is the owner of medical shop named ''Girraj Medical Store''. On 30-09 - 2021 in between 09:00-10:00 a.m., accused Raj alias Raju Bansal (herein applicant No.1) son of Pooranlal owner of Rajeshwari Misthan Bandar along with his father Pooranlal Bansal ( herein applicant No.2) and his friend Zakir Hussain










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top