MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Raj Alias Raju Bansal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to complaint and death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding charges and culpability. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court analysis of s.304 and s.304-a. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's decision on charges framed. (Para 8 , 9) |
1. By way of this criminal revision under S.397 read with S.401 of CrPC, applicants seeking for setting aside the impugned order of framing charges dated 16-12-2021 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Sabalgarh, District Morena passed in Sessions Trial No. 396 of 2021 whereby, charges have been framed against the applicants for commission of offence under S.323/34, 304 Part - I / 34, 506 Part - II of IPC.
2. Necessary facts for disposal of present revision in short are that on 30 - 09-2021 complainant Jagdish Prasad Gupta, the father of deceased Sakshi Gupta lodged a written complaint with police station Sabalgarh alleging therein that he is the owner of medical shop named ''Girraj Medical Store''. On 30-09 - 2021 in between 09:00-10:00 a.m., accused Raj alias Raju Bansal (herein applicant No.1) son of Pooranlal owner of Rajeshwari Misthan Bandar along with his father Pooranlal Bansal ( herein applicant No.2) and his friend Zakir Hussain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.