Back
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
A, J
Sunil Rathore – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of incident leading to conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument of appeal against trial court conviction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. questions arising for court's consideration. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. postmortem findings confirming homicide. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. eyewitness accounts affirming appellant's culpability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. addressing material contradictions in witness statements. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. reinforcement of credible testimony by forensic evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. caution in reviewing related witness testimonies. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. conclusion affirming trial court's decision. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
1. The appellant has preferred present criminal appeal under S.374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C.') against the impugned judgment dated 31/05/2017 passed by Sessions Judge, District Ratlam (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No.220/2011, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under S.302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ' IPC ') and has been sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that on 19/05/2011 at about 04:00 PM the deceased Faiyaz Hussain went to meet his relative S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
