SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pranay Verma, J
Bhagawan v. Gordhansingh


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not provided
For the Respondents: Not provided

1. This appeal under S.100 of the CPC has been preferred by the plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27/9/2024 passed in Civil Appeal No.24 - A / 2004 by the 4th Additional District Judge, Dewas whereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 21/04/2004 passed in C.S.No.20 - A / 2003 by the 2nd Civil Judge, Class I, District Dewas his claim for permanent injunction has been dismissed.

2. As per the plaintiff, Umrao Singh, predecessor in interest of defendant Nos.1 to 3 had entered into an agreement to sale with him on 12/12/1986 with respect to the suit land for a consideration of Rs.31,500/- and had delivered possession of the same to him. He has been in possession of the suit land ever since then. Umrao Singh did not execute the requisite sale deed in his favour though he continued to request him for a period of one year for the same. He has even otherwise acquired title to the suit land by virtue of adverse possession. Umrao Singh expired on 28/6/2002 after which defendant Nos.1 to 3 demanded possession of the suit land from him and threatened him in that regard.

3. Contending aforesaid on 19/8/2002 the plaintiff instituted an action for permanent injunction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top