Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pranay Verma, J
Bhagawan v. Gordhansingh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and plaintiff's claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants' counterclaims and court's initial findings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal arguments presented by both parties. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of legal principles and requirements. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. conclusion and final ruling of the court. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. This appeal under S.100 of the CPC has been preferred by the plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27/9/2024 passed in Civil Appeal No.24 - A / 2004 by the 4th Additional District Judge, Dewas whereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 21/04/2004 passed in C.S.No.20 - A / 2003 by the 2nd Civil Judge, Class I, District Dewas his claim for permanent injunction has been dismissed.
2. As per the plaintiff, Umrao Singh, predecessor in interest of defendant Nos.1 to 3 had entered into an agreement to sale with him on 12/12/1986 with respect to the suit land for a consideration of Rs.31,500/- and had delivered possession of the same to him. He has been in possession of the suit land ever since then. Umrao Singh did not execute the requisite sale deed in his favour though he continued to request
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
