Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
ALOK AWASTHI
Maya Dhakad – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Dhakad – Respondent
ORDER :
ALOK AWASTHI, J.
The petitioner has filed this present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 14.10.2025 passed in M.C.A. No.241/2025 by 34th District Judge, Indore, whereby the appellate court allowed the injunction appeal under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, reversing the well reasoned order of the trial Court.
2. FACTS OF THE CASE, IN SHORT, ARE AS UNDER:-
2.1 The petitioner came into acquaintance with the respondent, Shri Bharat Dhakad, through social media in the year 2016. The respondent represented himself as a widower whose wife had expired and that he had one son. Believing his representations and emotional assurances, the petitioner, who herself is a divorcee having one daughter, trusted him in good faith.
2.2 On the said assurance, the respondent solemnized a marriage ceremony with the petitioner on 29.05.2016 at Jamania Khurd Temple, Indore. The said marriage was performed between two and thereafter, both started residing together as husband and wife.
2.3 Subsequently, the petitioner came to know that all such representations made by the respondent were false and misleading. The respondent had concealed his true marital statu
Promise of marriage must be established as false from the outset to vitiate consent; refusal to marry after a consensual relationship does not constitute a crime under IPC.
The court upheld that prima facie evidence existed for a valid marriage, necessitating a trial on allegations of dowry and fraud, dismissing the petition to quash related FIR.
Wife entitled to maintenance under DV Act where marriage admitted, despite unproven prior marriage claims, until annulled by competent court; domestic violence proved warrants monetary and residence ....
A consensual sexual relationship between adults lasting for a prolonged period, where parties were aware of their marital status, does not automatically constitute rape under Section 376 IPC on the g....
General allegations against in-laws in matrimonial disputes require specific accusations to avoid quashing of FIR under Section 482, Cr.P.C.
The court established that voluntary expenditures made in the context of a relationship, despite misrepresentations, do not constitute cheating unless there is clear evidence of intent to deceive and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
