HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vinod Namdev – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr. – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
ON THE 5 OF DECEMBER, 2025 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 7863 of 2016 VINOD NAMDEV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR. AND OTHERS Appearance:
Shri S S Rajpoot - Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Samar Ghuraiya - Public Prosecutor for the respondents/ State.
ORDER This petition under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking leave to appeal is preferred by the complainant challenging the acquittal of the respondent/accused from the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as "138 of the Act of 1881") in criminal case No.2058/2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guna, District-Guna vide judgement dated 30/01/2016.
2. The Supreme Court in the matter of M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A.
Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804 held that the complainant in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 is also a victim as defined in Section 2(wa) of Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 2(y) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The Supreme Court has further held that the complainant in a complaint under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.