SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9542

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Govind Singh Kaurav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Subodh Tamrakar[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI

th

ON THE 15 OF DECEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 48458 of 2025 GOVIND SINGH KAURAV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sanjay Kumar Malvi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Varun Jain - Panel Lawyer for the State.

ORDER The petitioner is assailing the order impugned dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) by which the recovery was carried out against the petitioner. It is contended by the counsel that while working as Upper Division Clerk cum Accountant got superannuated on 31.7.2022, and after more than three years from his retirement, he was confronted with impugned order of recovery dated 10.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) and the said recovery was said to be carried out on the ground that pay fixation of the petitioner was incorrect and therefore, the said amount was required to be recovered.

2. It is contended by the counsel that the issue is no more res integra that there cannot be any recovery after retirement as the Full Bench of this Court in WA No.815/2017 ((State of M.P. & others Vs. Jagdish Prasad Dubey) has already decided the controversy, hence, the same deserves to be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top