SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9621

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mo Anas – Appellant
Versus
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd – Respondent


Advocates:
Akshay Jain[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA

th

ON THE 11 OF DECEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 48172 of 2025 MO ANAS Versus KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Akshay Jain - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

"8.1 This petition may kindly be allowed with cost.

8.2 To direct the Respondents thereby directing Respondents to remove the hold/freeze on the Bank account of petitioners.

8.3 Issue such other orders, writ, and direction as this Hon’ble court deems fit in the interest of justice in favour of petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others passed in W.P.

No.1100 of 2024 dated 26.04.2024.

3. So far as the decision rendered in the case of Malcolm Murayis (supra) is concerned, the same reads as under:-

"1] This order shall also govern the disposal of W.P. Nos.1100/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top