SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9660

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Parmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Suneel Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Deepak Shrivastav,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 11 OF DECEMBER, 2025 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 17743 of 2018 PARMAL SINGH AND OTHERS Versus SUNEEL KUMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Deepak Shrivastav - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri A P S Tomar - Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.2/State.

ORDER This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 19.04.2018 passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Ashoknagar in Cr.R. No. 50/2015 whereby the order dated 29.09.2015 passed by learned SDM in Case No. 2/2013/133 was upheld.

In brief, the facts of the case are that the respondent No.1, Sunil, filed an application under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) concerning land situated at Survey No. 742, measuring 0.021 hectares, in Village Mahidpur, Tehsil Isagarh. The land in question is government-owned and serves as a public common pathway used by the respondent and other villagers. The pathway had been constructed with Kharanja C.C. (cement concrete) by the Gram Panchayat Mahidpur, extending over a length of more than 40 feet. The petitioners, without an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top