SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9702

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Naushad Bi @ Guddo Bi – Appellant
Versus
Mus. Khutaija Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaideep Sirpurkar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL th ON THE 10 OF DECEMBER, 2025 SECOND APPEAL No. 400 of 2014 NAUSHAD BI @ GUDDO BI AND OTHERS Versus MUS. KHUTAIJA BEGUM ___________________________________________________________

Appearance:

Shri Jaideep Sirpurkar with Shri Yash Nitin Naseri -Advocates for the appellants.

Shri Raja Bhaiya Tiwari - Advocate for the respondent.

____________________________________________________________________________

J U D G M E N T This second appeal has been preferred by the appellants/defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2014 passed by First Additional Judge to the Court of First Additional District Judge, Chhindwara in Civil Appeal No.3A/2014 reversing the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2011 passed by Third Civil Judge Class-I, Chhindwara, in Civil Suit No.56-A/2011, whereby Trial Court dismissed the respondent/plaintiff’s suit for eviction of residential premises filed on the grounds of defaults in making payment of monthly rent and bonafide requirement of residence available under Section 12(1)(a)&(e) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) and in civil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top