SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9723

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anwar Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Saiyad Ali Abbas Naqvi – Respondent


Advocates:
Abdul Baseem Khan,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI

th

ON THE 8 OF DECEMBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 11815 of 2025 ANWAR HUSSAIN Versus SAIYAD ALI ABBAS NAQVI Appearance:

Shri A.B. Khan, learned counsel for appellant.

Shri Himanshu Soni, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER This appeal has been filed under Section 419 of BNSS, by the victim/complainant against judgment dated 31.10.2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur (M.P.) in SCNIA No.988/2019, whereby respondents/accused person has been acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

2. Aforesaid criminal case was instituted on the basis of private complaint filed by the victim/appellant.

3. The question before this Court is whether instant appeal is covered under proviso to section 413 of BNSS (372 of Cr.P.C.).

4. The aforesaid issue is no longer res integra in light of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025 SCC Online SC 1320. The issue arose in said adjudication was whether an appeal would be maintainable under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top