SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9728

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Dashoda Bai – Appellant
Versus
Anandi Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Shyam Yadav[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 8 OF DECEMBER, 2025 MISC. PETITION No. 6985 of 2025 SMT. DASHODA BAI Versus ANANDI PATEL AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Shyam Yadav - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER By way of present the petitioner has called into question the order Annexure P-4 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer as confirmed by the Additional Collector vide order Annexure P-6. The appeal of the petitioner had been rejected by the SDO on the ground of it being barred by limitation and the revision has also been dismissed confirming the said order.

2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had a right to get order on merits and only on the basis of limitation and delay appeal against mutation entries could not have been rejected by the SDO. It is therefore prayed that the appeal be directed to be decided on merits because the present petitioner was not party in the original mutation proceedings and she had filed appeal immediately after getting knowledge of the mutation proceedings.

3. Upon considering the aforesaid, it is seen that the petitioner is grand-

daughter of the deceased landowner and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top