SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9764

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vinod Kumar Bargahi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KHOT

th

ON THE 8 OF DECEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 21877 of 2019 VINOD KUMAR BARGAHI Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Kailash Chandra Ghildiyal - Senior Advocate with Shri Karnik Singh - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Anshuman Swamy - G.A. for the respondent/State.

ORDER The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs :-

i) A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned order dated 20.4.2016 (Annexure P/4) and

27.4.2018 (Annexure P/5) issued by respondent no.5 and 3.

ii) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondents to relieve the petitioner of all the consequential of the order of penalty dated 20.4.2016 and also refund the amount, which has been recovered from the petitioner along with interest.

iii) Any other appropriate writ order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case including cost of the litigation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top