IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 10 OF DECEMBER, 2025 CIVIL REVISION No. 926 of 2003 M/S DHARAMPAL KOHLI Versus STATE OF M.P. & ORS Appearance:

Shri Shravan Kumar Rao - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Ritwik Parashar, Government Advocate for respondents.

ORDER Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal The present revision petition under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 has been preferred by the applicant/petitioner against the award dated 31.07.2003 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal in Reference Case No.26 of 1998, whereby the claim of the petitioner–contractor was rejected on the ground of limitation.

2. Petitioner has taken the following ground in revision that the learned Tribunal has exercised jurisdiction not vested by law and passed the award in a very casual manner. All findings of learned Tribunal are perverse. The learned Tribunal has exercised jurisdiction illegally inasmuch as the learned Tribunal has ignored the documentary as well oral evidence and finding given is wholly perverse. Finding is also perverse to the effect that the