SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9774

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M/S Rewa Construction Com. – Appellant
Versus
Narmada Valley Development Auth. & Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
Vr.Rao,S.Rao,A.G.,Sudesh Verma[Ga][2]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 10 OF DECEMBER, 2025 CIVIL REVISION No. 712 of 2003 M/S REWA CONSTRUCTION COM.

Versus NARMADA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AUTH. & ORS Appearance:

Shri Shravan Kumar Rao - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Abhijeet Awasthi, Deputy Advocate General for respondents.

ORDER Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal The present revision petition under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 has been preferred by the applicant/petitioner against the award dated 03.02.2003 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal in Reference Case No.61 of 1996, whereby the claim of the petitioner–contractor was rejected on the ground of limitation.

2. Petitioner has taken the following ground in revision that the learned Tribunal has exercised jurisdiction not vested by law and passed the award in a very casual manner. All findings of learned Tribunal are perverse. The learned Tribunal has exercised jurisdiction illegally inasmuch as the learned Tribunal has ignored the documentary as well oral evidence and finding given is wholly perverse. Finding is al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top