SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9779

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sayed Abdul Baseer – Appellant
Versus
Shariq Baseer – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaideep Sirpurkar[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 5 OF DECEMBER, 2025 CIVIL REVISION No. 1206 of 2025 SAYED ABDUL BASEER AND OTHERS Versus SHARIQ BASEER AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Jaideep Sirpurkar - Advocate for petitioners.

Shri Manoj Kushwaha - Advocate for respondents.

ORDER The present revision has been filed challenging the order dated

15.10.2025 passed by the trial Court thereby rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the petitioners/defendants.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected on various grounds, but the present revision is being pressed only on two grounds i.e. in absence of challenging the orders of the Revenue court the suit was not maintainable and secondly that ad valorem court fees had to be paid and valuation had to be made as per market value of the property.

3. So far as the question of suit not being maintainable in absence of challenging the orders of the revenue authorities is concerned, it is seen that the orders of Revenue authorities are orders of mutation on land. The counsel for the petitioners had vehemently relied o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top