SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9794

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satish Kumar Rawat – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Rawat – Respondent


Advocates:
Praveen Kumar Newaskar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

nd

ON THE 2 OF DECEMBER, 2025 SECOND APPEAL No. 2008 of 2022 SATISH KUMAR RAWAT AND OTHERS Versus JAGDISH RAWAT AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rohit Bansal - Advocate for appellants.

Shri Rajeev Shrivastava - Advocate for respondent No.1.

Ms. Neha Bhadoriya - Proxy counsel for respondent No.2, on behalf of Shri Santosh Agrawal - Advocate.

Shri S.S. Kushwah - Government Advocate for the State.

ORDER

1. Heard on the question of admission.

2. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of CPC has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2022 passed by Third District Judge, Guna in Civil Appeal No.41/2017 as well as the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2017 passed by the 1st Civil Judge Class 1, Guna in Civil Suit No.36-A/2015.

3. The appellants are the plaintiffs who had lost their case from both the Courts below. The original plaintiff Gulab Bai died during the pendency of suit, and accordingly her legal representatives were brought on record and present appeal has been filed by the legal representatives of original plaintiff.

4. The facts necessary for disposal of present appeal in short are that, acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top