SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9805

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Hansraj Jain – Appellant
Versus
Premlatabai – Respondent


Advocates:
Jahangir M. Poonegar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PAVAN KUMAR DWIVEDI

th

ON THE 28 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 MISC. APPEAL No. 1027 of 2016 VIMLA JAIN Versus PREMLATABAI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Jahangir M. Poonegar, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Sudhir Dandwate, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

WITH MISC. APPEAL No. 1029 of 2016 HANSRAJ JAIN Versus PREMLATABAI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Jahangir M. Poonegar, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Sudhir Dandwate, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

ORDER These Misc. Appeals have been filed by the claimants under Section

173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act being aggrieved by the award dated 29.02.2016 passed by learned IV Additional Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Khargone (M.P.) in Claim Case Nos.15/2014 and 16/2014, challenging the quantum of compensation.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 23.06.2012 at around 5:30 in the morning, the driver of the vehicle was driving in a rash and negligent manner. Consequently, the vehicle dashed into a boulder resulting in the death of the driver and injuries to the present appellants / claimants because of this, they filed separate claim petitions bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top